Соотношение «права ВТО» и национального права государств-членов | страница 126



22. Ehlermann C.D. On the Direct Effect of the WTO Agreements / Einhorn T. (ed.). Spontaneous Order, Organization and the Law: Roads to a European Civil society. – The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2003. – P. 413–419.

23. Fitzmaurice G. The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law // Recueil des Cours. – 1957. – Vol. 92. – P. 1—227.

24. Fitzmaurice G. The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: General Principles and Sources of International Law // British Yearbook of International Law. – 1953. – Vol. 30. – P. 1—70.

25. Hafner-Burton E.M. Trade and Development Agreements for Human Rights? // GREAT Insights. – Vol. 1. Issue 2. – Maastricht: ECDPM, 2012. – P. 1–4.

26. Heiskanen V. The Relation of International and Municipal Law // The Finnish Yearbook of International Law. – 1990. – Vol. I. – P. 154–256.

27. Hilf M. Power, Rules and Principles – Which Orientation for WTO/GATT law? // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2001. – Vol. 4. – P. 111–130.

28. Hilf M., Goettsche G.J. The Relation of Economic and Non– Economic Principles in International Law in Griller, S. (ed), International Economic Governance and Non-Economic Concerns: New Challenges for the International Legal Order. Springer: Vienna, 2003. – P. 5—46.

29. Howse R. The Appellate Body Rulings in the Shrimp / Turtle Case: A New Legal Baseline for the Trade and Environmental Debate // Columbia Journal Environmental Law. – 2002. – Vol. 27. – P. 489–519.

30. Iwasawa Y. Kokusai Ho Hanrei no Ugoki [Trends of the Case Law on International Law] // Jurist. – 2006. – N 1313.

31. Jackson J.H. The WTO ‘Constitution’ and Proposed Reform: Seven ‘Mantras’ Revisited // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2001. – Vol. 4. – P. 67–78.

32. Jackson J.H. Status of Treaties in Domestic Legal Systems: A Policy Analysis // American Journal of International Law. – 1992. – Vol. 86. – P. 310–340.

33. Kuijper P.J. The Law of the GATT as a Special Field of International Law: Ignorance, Further Refinement or Self-Contained System of International Law? // NETHERLANDS Yearbook of International Law. – 1994. – Vol. 25. – P. 227–257.

34. Lafer C. The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System // Gilberto Amado Memorial Lectures. Brasilia: FUNAG, 2012. – P. 583–616.

35. Leebron D. Implementation of the Uruguay Round Results in the United States / Jackson J., Sykes A. (eds.). Implementing the Uruguay Round. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. – P. 175–242.